Maybe you think that Kerafol is not as famous as Bergquist, Laird or Fujipoly, but it is widely uesd in electronic applications and recognised for high performance, high reliability by customer. Can we find an alternative to Kerafol thermal interface materials, for example, Kerafol Keratherm U281 in China? GLPOLY XK-PN20 is a non-silicone thermal pad, let’s check it out what the difference is.

Keratherm U281 is non-silicone material based with 2.0W/mK thermal conductivity and 0.37℃in2/W of thermal resistance. Though Keratherm U281 is just a medium thermal performance non-silicone thermal pad, its thermal performance exceed other similar products of top brand such as Bergquist, Laird or Fujipoly.

GLPOLY is at the cutting-edge of non-silicone thermal materials development in China, offering silicone free thermal pad, gel and compound. XK-PN20 is similar to Keratherm U281, silicone free, same thermal conductivity and thermal resistance. Do they offer same performance? Another element-hardness will affect thermal performance too, GLPOLY silicone free thermal pad’s hardness is Shore00 40, it’s softer than Keratherm U281, that means XK-PN20 is more conformable for component topography, expelling air and reducing contact resistance. We consider that GLPOLY XK-PN20 silicone free thermal pad is as good as Keratherm U281 at least.

We can see that GLPOLY non-silicone thermal pad XK-PN20 can substitute for Kerafol keratherm U281. Furthermore, GLPOLY is able to  provide more products such as thermal gel and dispensable thermal gap filler, silicone or silicone free based, please contact lynn@glpoly.com or 86-755-27579310 for detail.

GLPOLY has partnered with Huawei Marine, Han's SMC, Freetech and DT mobile etc., delivering technologically advanced thermal management solution backed by superior service.