GLPOLY silicone free thermal pad XK-PN20 substitutes for Kerafol U281

Maybe Kerafol thermal interface materials is not as famous as Bergquist, 3M or Fujipoly, but it is widely uesd in electronic applications and recognised by high performance, high reliability. Can we find an alternative to Kerafol, for example, Kerafol Keratherm U281? GLPOLY XK-PN20 is a silicone free thermal pad, let’s check it out what the differences are.

Keratherm U281 is non-silicone material based with 2.0W/mK of thermal conductivity and 0.37℃in2/W of thermal resistance. Though Kerafol Keratherm U281 is just a medium thermal performance silicone free thermal pad, its thermal performance exceeds other similar products of top brands such as Bergquist, 3M or Fujipoly.

GLPOLY is at the cutting-edge of silicone free thermal materials development in China, offering silicone free thermal pad, gel and compound. XK-PN20 is similar to Keratherm U281, silicone free, same thermal conductivity and thermal resistance. Do they offer same performance? Another element-hardness will affect thermal performance too, GLPOLY silicone free thermal pad’s hardness is Shore00 40, it’s softer than Keratherm U281, that means XK-PN20 silicone free thermal pad is more conformable for component topography, expelling air and reducing contact resistance. We consider that GLPOLY XK-PN20 silicone free thermal pad is as good as Keratherm U281 at least.

We can see that GLPOLY silicone free thermal pad XK-PN20 can well substitute for Kerafol keratherm U281. Furthermore, GLPOLY is able to  provide more products such as thermal gel and dispensable thermal gap filler, silicone or silicone free based, please contact kemmy@glpoly.com or 86-755-27579310 for detail.